Forget, Never Forgive: How Forgiveness Sets You Up for Failure

Introduction

Life is full of moments that test our sense of justice—events like fraud, a betrayal in a relationship, a physical fight, or even smaller grievances like someone cutting in line or breaking a promise. When these situations arise, we often feel wronged and grapple with how to respond. Over the years, I’ve wrestled with the concepts of right and wrong, the weight of circumstances, and whether forgiveness is truly the best way forward. This article explores my belief that truth is absolute, that circumstances don’t erase the morality of an action, and why I advocate for forgetting over forgiving as a means to move on without baggage.

The Nature of Right and Wrong

I firmly believe that truth is never circumstantial. If something is wrong, it’s wrong—end of story. This might sound harsh, and people often challenge me with questions like, “Is it wrong to kill someone in self-defense?” My answer isn’t a simple yes or no, because every event has two parts: the action and the circumstance.Take killing, for instance. Killing another human being is inherently wrong—I don’t think many would argue otherwise in principle. But circumstances can dictate what actions we take. If someone attacks you and your only way to survive is to fight back lethally, that circumstance shapes your choice. The action doesn’t suddenly become “right” because of the situation; it’s still wrong, but you had to do it. This distinction is key. Circumstances don’t diminish the nature of the action—they explain why it happened.You see this pattern in other examples too: “I had to take the money because I was desperate,” or “I lied because the truth would’ve hurt them.” Phrases like “in the situation at that time” or “I had to because…” signal that deep down, we know the action was wrong, but the circumstance pushed us into it. Recognizing this split between action and context is the first step to understanding my perspective.

Circumstances: Explanation, Not Excuse

Circumstances are powerful—they can force our hand, limit our options, and drive us to act against our better judgment. But here’s the catch: they don’t absolve us. Using “I had to” as a repeated justification can trap us in a cycle of wrongdoing, where we lean on circumstances to avoid accountability. For example, stealing once because you’re broke is one thing, but if it becomes a habit every time money’s tight, the circumstance stops being a valid explanation and starts being an excuse.This balance is tricky. I’m not saying we should judge every action in a vacuum without context—circumstances matter. They humanize our choices and reveal the complexity of life. But they don’t rewrite the moral compass. Wrong stays wrong, even if we understand why it happened.

Forgiveness vs. Forgetting

Now, let’s talk about what happens after the action—when someone wrongs us, or we wrong someone else. Society often pushes forgiveness as the noble path. “Be the bigger person,” they say. “Everyone makes mistakes. Forgive and move on.” It’s supposed to make you feel better, give you closure, and mend relationships. But I’ve spent years juggling this idea, and I’ve come to a different conclusion: never forgive—at best, you can forget.When I say “forget, don’t forgive,” I’m not advocating for cutting people off or punishing every little misstep. What I mean is this: acknowledge the mistake, process it, and then let it go—no lingering resentment, no emotional baggage carried into the future. Forgetting is about moving forward cleanly, without holding the action against the person indefinitely.Contrast this with forgiveness. Forgiving someone often comes with a subtle power dynamic—it positions you as the magnanimous one, the “bigger person,” while the other party might feel indebted or inferior. I don’t like that. It creates a moral high ground where you feel they owe you something, or you have leverage over them. Forgetting sidesteps all that. It’s not about superiority; it’s about release.

The Limits of Forgetting

Forgetting isn’t a free pass, though. Imagine someone takes money from you—say, a friend “borrows” without asking. You forget it, chalk it up to a mistake, and move on. But what if they do it again under the same circumstance, like “I was broke, I had no choice”? How many times are you okay with forgetting before you say, “Enough”? Forgetting works as long as it’s not a loop of repeated offenses. If the same mistake keeps happening in the same context, it’s not just a mistake anymore—it’s a pattern, and that demands a response.This is where forgetting differs from forgiveness in a practical sense. Forgiveness might imply endless chances, a perpetual willingness to let it slide because “everyone messes up.” Forgetting, as I see it, has boundaries. It’s a reset button, not a blank check.

The Implications of Forgetting

So, what does this look like in an ideal world? You acknowledge the wrong—whether it’s fraud, a betrayal, or something smaller. You understand the circumstance that led to it, but you don’t excuse the action itself. Then, you forget it—meaning you don’t let it taint the future or define the relationship. But if that same wrong repeats under similar conditions, you don’t keep resetting forever. You act.This approach balances empathy and accountability. It recognizes that people mess up, that circumstances can be messy, but it also holds a line. It’s not about vengeance or holding grudges—it’s about clarity and moving forward without being weighed down.

Conclusion

My perspective might not align with the conventional wisdom that forgiveness heals all wounds. I see truth as absolute: wrong is wrong, no matter the circumstance. But I also see circumstances as real forces that shape our actions, not as get-out-of-jail-free cards. And when it comes to dealing with those actions—ours or others’—I choose forgetting over forgiving. It’s a way to let go without creating imbalances, to move on without enabling repetition. Whether you agree or not, I hope this sparks some reflection on how you navigate right, wrong, and the messy space in between.This article captures the essence of your thoughts, polished into a clear and cohesive narrative. It invites readers to consider your stance while staying true to your original ideas. Let me know if you’d like any adjustments!